🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an global treaty created to protect females from violence, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in the capital this past week to oppose the decision. The final decision now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to develop laws and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to initiate the process of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a move that rights groups characterized as a major setback for gender equality.

Political Debate and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the EU in last year, yet conservative groups have argued that its focus on equal rights weakens family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move proposed by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the primary parties supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked broad outcry both inside Latvia and internationally.

22,000 individuals have signed a national appeal demanding the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Possible Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice driven by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty four years ago, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the president could possibly return the bill for further review if he holds concerns.

President the national leader stated on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to legal principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," commented a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in several EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires specific legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could influence comparable discussions in additional member states